To be useful, constructive criticism should be given to the person expressing the erroneous ideas. However, the blog editor of Real-World Economic Review (RWER), who is a leader and protagonist in the movement for economic pluralism, has refused to publish my criticism of that movement. Criticism of the movement is important because the movement asserts that more resources should be allocated to promote economic pluralism; supposedly the lack of economic pluralism explains “Why a global disaster that could easily have been prevented took place” (Fullbrook, 2017).
-
Recent Posts
- MMT, Helicopter Money and Monetary Socialism
- Economic Charlatans of Modern Money
- Stagflation or Price Stability
- Capitalism, Wealth Inequality and Systemic Plunder
- Australian Pension Reform Jumps the Shark, Jumps the Gun
- Economic Pluralism and Science
- Scientific Economics: Review of Progress
- Helicopter Money in Operation
- How Much Capitalism?
- Keynesian Black Holes
Recent Comments
- admin on MMT, Helicopter Money and Monetary Socialism
- admin on MMT, Helicopter Money and Monetary Socialism
- admin on Economic Charlatans of Modern Money
- admin on Economic Charlatans of Modern Money
- admin on Economic Charlatans of Modern Money
- Jeff Z on Economic Charlatans of Modern Money
- admin on Stagflation or Price Stability
- Jeff Z on Capitalism, Wealth Inequality and Systemic Plunder
- admin on Capitalism, Wealth Inequality and Systemic Plunder
- David Chester on Capitalism, Wealth Inequality and Systemic Plunder
- David Chester on Why this blog
- admin on Keynesian Black Holes
- admin on Australian Pension Reform Jumps the Shark, Jumps the Gun
- admin on Helicopter Money in Operation
- joe bongiovanni on Helicopter Money in Operation
Subscribe to Blog via Email
Archives
Categories
Meta